|
Mid-Missouri John Clayton Smith - Missouri's next execution |
P.O. Box 268 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
**** Take action to protest and help halt the scheduled execution of John Clayton Smith****
John Clayton Smith has chosen an extreme measure to show his deep remorse for killing Brandie Kearnes, his ex-girlfriend and her stepfather Wayne Hoewing. Smith says he wants to be executed and has dropped all available legal appeals. Missouri officials, all too willing to oblige, plan to poison him to death late the evening of 28 October, just after midnight. He would be the 61st person executed in Missouri since 1989, 4th most of U.S. states. Beyond the immorality of murder by the state, his execution is troubling as Smith is mentally ill and may not be competent to choose whether his life should be ended by state officials. Psychiatrists have determined him to be afflicted by bipolar disorder with psychotic features. He currently is taking psychotropic medication prescribed by prison doctors. Without a doubt, Smith committed contemptible crimes, meriting incarceration. Apparently angry she stopped dating him, Smith fatally knifed Kearnes then Hoewing in their home near Canton in northeastern Missouri in 1997. He also injured Yvonne Kurz, her mother, who thankfully survived. We extend our condolences to Mrs. Kurz and others still mourning the violent deaths of their loved ones. The state killing of John Smith and any other human beings is morally abysmal, never warranted, and is just a vile mimicking of the violence, our society so rightly condemns. Our state also shouldn’t be in the business of granting death wishes to suicidal individuals, regardless of their crimes. We hope Smith will resume filing his appeals— recognizing the immense value of his own Creator-given life, even when it’s likely that life would be spent in prison. Additionally, Smith has a strong claim to receive a new trial due to misconduct by Jules DeCoster the Lewis County prosecutor who should have recused himself. In a Missouri Supreme Court decision upholding Smith's death sentence, two judges in their dissenting opinion wrote, the prosecutor "represented Smith in two previous criminal cases… (He singled out) one of those convictions in persuading the jury to impose the death penalty on his former client. The fact is that he had a confidential relationship with Smith in which Smith was encouraged to disclose to the attorney the darkest secrets of his life." (For more details about John Smith and his case, please see below the actions listed, for the action alert sent out by Amnesty International. Thanks to Stacie Hanson, AI's Missouri death penalty coordinator, for forwarding it along.) * Contact Governor Bob Holden * Contact John Smith. * Join in any of the following actions for life on Tuesday, 28 October: Thanks in advance for whatever life-affirming actions you can take. In struggle and hope of developing greater compassion in our society, * * * September 2003 John Clayton Smith (m), aged 41, white, is scheduled to be executed in Missouri on 29 October 2003. He was sentenced to death in 1999 for the murder of his former girlfriend Brandie Kearnes and her stepfather, Wayne Hoewing, in 1997. In December 2000, the Missouri Supreme Court upheld John Smith's death sentence, by five votes to two. The two dissenting judges argued that he should receive a new trial because the prosecutor in the case had previously represented Smith and should have withdrawn from the case. The dissent wrote: "In a fundamental way, the [majority] opinion damages the integrity of the legal profession. There is no dispute that the prosecutor in this case had represented Smith in two previous criminal cases as his defense attorney. Moreover, the prosecutor - Smith's erstwhile defender - used one of those convictions in persuading the jury to impose the death penalty on his former client. The fact is that he had a confidential relationship with Smith in which Smith was encouraged to disclose to the attorney the darkest secrets of his life. This fact, along with the fact that the death penalty was sought, makes such a dual representation unacceptable. As the principal opinion acknowledges, a defendant's previous criminal and antisocial conduct, along with the defendant's background, come into play in the prosecutor's decision as to whether to seek the death penalty. The prosecutor's failure to disqualify himself from representing the state against his former client poses a serious question, in a death penalty case, as to the integrity of the system under which Smith was tried". John Smith could pursue this and other legal claims in the state and federal courts, but has chosen to drop any further appeals against his conviction and death sentence. John Smith has been diagnosed with mental illness, specifically bipolar disorder with psychotic features, and is on medication in prison. On death row in August 1999 he was treated for an apparent suicide attempt and placed on suicide watch. In the same month, a prison psychiatrist found that he was having hallucinations and delusions. Smith reported seeing images projected on the wall and believed he was receiving messages through the television. In October 1999, a prison doctor found that John Smith was expressing "bizarre and confused thinking and conduct, strange attitudes, and false beliefs". After John Smith dropped his appeals, a state court ruled that he was competent to do so, but without ordering a new mental evaluation to determine his competency. In March 2003, the Missouri Supreme Court upheld this decision. The issue is currently on appeal to the US Supreme Court. In repeated resolutions since 1997, the United Nations Commission on Human Rights has called on all countries not to impose or carry out the death penalty on anyone suffering from any form of mental disorder. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: About 100 men and women have been executed in the USA since 1977 after giving up their appeals at some stage in the process (for a list of about 90 of these individuals see USA: The illusion of control: "Consensual executions, the impending death of Timothy McVeigh, and the brutalizing futility of capital punishment, AMR 51/053/2001, April 2001). While such executions are sometimes characterized as a form of state- assisted suicide, "prisoner-assisted homicide" might be a more accurate label. If a death row inmate seeks to commit actual suicide, as more than 50 condemned prisoners have successfully done since 1977, the state will make every effort to prevent it. The cases show that there may be any number of factors contributing to a prisoner's decision not to pursue appeals against his or her death sentence, including mental disorder, physical illness, remorse, bravado, religious belief, the severity of conditions of confinement including prolonged isolation and lack of physical contact visits, the bleak alternative of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, pessimism about appeal prospects, a quest for notoriety, or simply as a way for the prisoner to gain a semblance of control over a situation in which they are otherwise helpless. Amnesty International considers that a decision taken by someone who is under threat of death at the hands of others cannot be consensual. What is more, it cannot disguise the fact that the state is involved in a premeditated killing, a human rights violation that is a symptom of a culture of violence, not a solution to it. Whether or not a prisoner who "asks" to be executed is deluding himself or herself about the level of control they have gained over their fate - after all, they are merely assisting their government in what it has set out to do anyway - the state is guilty of a far greater deception. It is peddling its own illusion of control: that, by killing a selection of those it convicts of murder, it can offer a constructive contribution to efforts to defeat violent crime. In reality, the state is taking to refined, calculated heights what it seeks to condemn - the deliberate taking of human life. The phenomenon of prisoners "volunteering" for execution is one more factor contributing to arbitrariness in the death penalty. To put it another way, given the rate of reversible error found in capital cases, if the 100 individuals who have been executed after waiving their appeals had pursued their full legal options, there is a significant probability that a number of them would have had their death sentences overturned to prison terms by the appeal courts. Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases, unconditionally. Today, 112 countries have abolished the death penalty in law or practice. In contrast to this, the USA has put more than 870 men and women to death since resuming executions in January 1977. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please send appeals to arrive as quickly as possible, in
your own words using any of the above information as you see fit: APPEALS TO: You may also write brief letters of concern (not more than 250 words) to: The News Tribune Learn more about the Urgent Action Network or read the latest UAN newsletter. back to top |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||